Until recently, it was assumed that only bacteria and algae possessed the merB operon exploited during the enzymatic reduction of methylmercury to the volatile, less toxic form Hg(0), but recent investigations into horizontal gene transfer events in fungi have potentially identified transmission of MerB.  An alkylmercury lyase discovered in Metarhizium robertsii shows synonymous functionality with the operationally characterised bacterial MeHg demethylase MerB. To determine whether the protein retained its inherited function, researchers ran gene expression trials on the model organism Escherichia coli, finding that Hg resistance was indeed increased in the bacteria, as well as confirming that the purified protein removed the methyl group from MeHg to produce Hg2+. MerB works in concert with a mercury ion reductase, MerA, to achieve mercury resistance. Resistance to mercury is made possible by three components of microbial physiology: 

  1. A permeable barrier (phospholipid bilayer) that limits mercury uptake. 

  2. The production of chelating agents (thiols) that facilitate mercury sequestration, thereby limiting its bioavailability.

  3. Biovolatilization, which involves the reduction of Hg(II) to volatile Hg(0) through an inducible mercuric ion reductase coded by the mer operon. 

While this enzymatic machinery is well-documented in bacteria and algae, the discovery of methylmercury demethylase in fungi is particularly significant because the symbiotic partnerships formed between plants and certain fungi are simultaneously protective and enriching, meaning remediation strategies that can employ living fungal biomass present restorative opportunities beyond Heavy metal removal. Fungi can expand a plant’s access to nutrients, increase growth traits across the plant body, assist in pathogen and predation defense, and limit the uptake and accumulation of foreign agents, including heavy metals within plant tissues. Additionally, the support offered by symbionts stimulates microbial activity and nutrient balance in the rhizosphere. These routine charges carried out by fungi, taken in conjunction with their successful remediation activities could serve not only to ameliorate the toxicities of contaminants but provide stable and robust restoration for the extended plant and microbial populations. Studies have already accessed the viability of Hg-tolerant fungi in the remediation of Mercury from soil and the beneficial interactions between plants and fungi under mercury stress. These studies have demonstrated the protective abilities of fungi containing both demethylase and mercury ion reductase features (Penicillium spp., DC-F11 & Metarhizium robertsii) Hg-contaminated soils, as evidenced by plant root count, plant height, and fungal colony forming units.

Fungal Strain Capacity pH Time Viability Remediation type Application/Process References
Saccharomyces
cerevisiae
80% 6.5 72h Immobilised Biosorption Milk Massoud et al 2020
Saccharomyces
cerevisiae
99.4% 5 24h Viable Biosorption Batch experiments Hadiani et al 2018
Mucor hiemalis 99% 7 48h Immobilised Biosorption Batch experiments Hoque & Fritscher 2019
Aspergillus niger 80 % 5.3 7d Viable volatilization
Bioaccumulation
Contaminated soil Urik et al 2014
C. cladosporioides 80% 4.3 7d Viable volatilization Contaminated soil Urik et al 2014
Penicillium canescens 54.8 mg/g 5 6h immobilised Adsorption Batch experiments say et al 2003
Aspergillus niger 83.2% 5.5 24h immobilised biosorption Iron Oxide-Coated
Biomass
Penicillium oxalicum 270 mg/g 6.2 24h Immobilised Biosorption Batch experiments Svecova et al 2006
Penicillium
purpurogenum
70.4 mg/g 5 4h immobilised Biosorption Batch experiments Say et al 2002
Aspergillus flavus 95.6% 7 30m Immobilised Biosorption Batch experiments Mahmoud et al 2017
Lecythophora
sp.KJ957772
86.8% N/A 24h Viable volatilization Fungus & biochar
combination
Chang et al 2019
Aspergillus niger 95% N/A 5d Immobilised Adsorption
Immobilisation
Amalgamation/
WHBC + biomass
of A. niger
Narayanan et al 2021
Zygosaccharomyces
bailii
93.3% N/A 14d Immobilised Biosorption Kombucha et al 2020
Coprinus micaceus 100% 5 2h Immobilised Biosorption Fe2O3 magnetic
nanoparticle.
Özdemir et al 2019
Penicillium
spp. DC-F11
84% N/A 7d Viable adsorption
Precipitation
Batch experiments Chang et al 2020
Lactarius acerrimus 95% 5 2h Viable Biosorption Batch experiments Naeemullah et al 2020
  • Acosta-Rodríguez, I., Cárdenas-González, J.F., Rodríguez Pérez, A.S., Oviedo, J.T. and Martínez-Juárez, V.M. (2018). Bioremoval of Different Heavy Metals by the Resistant Fungal StrainAspergillus Niger. Bioinorganic Chemistry and Applications, [online] 2018, pp.1–7. doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/3457196

    Chang, J., Duan, Y., Jia Jyun Dong, Shen, S.-L., Si, G., He, F., Yang, Q. and Chen, J. (2019). Bioremediation of Hg-contaminated Soil by Combining a Novel Hg-volatilizing Lecythophora sp. fungus, DC-F1, with biochar: Performance and the Response of Soil Fungal Community. Science of the Total Environment, 671, pp.676–684. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.409.

    Chang, J., Shi, Y., Si, G., Yang, Q., Dong, J. and Chen, J. (2020). The bioremediation potentials and mercury(II)-resistant mechanisms of a novel fungus Penicillium spp. DC-F11 isolated from contaminated soil. Journal of Hazardous Materials, [online] 396, p.122638. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.122638.

    Li, X., Zhang, D., Sheng, F. and Qing, H. (2018). Adsorption Characteristics of Copper (Ⅱ), Zinc (Ⅱ) and Mercury (Ⅱ) by Four Kinds of Immobilized Fungi Residues. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, [online] 147, pp.357–366. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2017.08.058.

    Mahmoud, M.E., Gehan, Farag, A.M. and Abdelwahab, M.A. (2017). Assessment of heat-inactivated Marine Aspergillus Flavus as a Novel Biosorbent for Removal of Cd(II), Hg(II), and Pb(II) from Water. 24(22), pp.18218–18228. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-9323-8.

    Najafpour, A., Rajabi Khorrami, A., Aberoomand Azar, P. and Saber Tehrani, M. (2020). Study of Heavy Metals Biosorption by Tea Fungus in Kombucha Drink Using Central Composite Design. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis, 86, p.103359. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfca.2019.103359.

    Narayanan, M., Kandasamy, G., Kandasamy, S., Natarajan, D., Devarayan, K., Alsehli, M., Elfasakhany, A. and Pugazhendhi, A. (2021). Water hyacinth biochar and Aspergillus niger biomass amalgamation potential in removal of pollutants from polluted lake water. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, [online] 9(4), p.105574. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2021.105574.

    Özdemir, S., Mohamedsaid, S.A., Kılınç, E. and Soylak, M. (2019). Magnetic Solid Phase Extractions of Co(II) and Hg(II) by Using Magnetized C. Micaceus from Water and Food Samples. Food Chemistry, [online] 271, pp.232–238. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.07.067.

    Say, R., Yilmaz, N. and Denizli, A. (2003). Removal of Heavy Metal Ions Using the Fungus Penicillium Canescens. Adsorption Science & Technology, 21(7), pp.643–650. doi:https://doi.org/10.1260/026361703772776420.

    Say, R., Yılmaz, N. and Denizli, A. (2003). Biosorption of Cadmium, Lead, Mercury, and Arsenic Ions by the FungusPenicillium purpurogenum. Separation Science and Technology, 38(9), pp.2039–2053. doi:https://doi.org/10.1081/ss-120020133.

    Svecova, L., Spanelova, M., Kubal, M. and Guibal, E. (2006). Cadmium, Lead and Mercury Biosorption on Waste Fungal Biomass Issued from Fermentation industry. I. Equilibrium Studies. Separation and Purification Technology, 52(1), pp.142–153. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2006.03.024.

    Dr. Dr. Hoque, Enam AU - Fritscher, Johannes PY - 2019/07/16 SP - T1 - Multimetal bioremediation and biomining by a combination of new aquatic strains of Mucor hiemalis OPEN VL - 9 DO - 10.1038/s41598-019-46560-7 JO - Scientific Reports ER -

    Khambhaty, Yasmin AU - Mody, Kalpana AU - Basha, Shaik AU - Jha, Bhavanath PY - 2009/03/01 SP - 531 EP - 539 T1 - Biosorption of Inorganic Mercury onto Dead Biomass of Marine Aspergillus niger : Kinetic, Equilibrium, and Thermodynamic Studies VL - 26 DO - 10.1089/ees.2008.0056 JO - Environmental Engineering Science - ENVIRON ENG SCI ER -

    Massoud, Ramona AU - Sharifan, Anoosheh AU - Khosravi, Kianoush AU - Asadi, GholamHassan PY - 2020/11/11 SP - T1 - Mercury biosorption process by using Saccharomyces cerevisiae in milk VL - 45 DO - 10.1111/jfpp.15008 JO - Journal of Food Processing and Preservation ER -

    Urík, M., Hlodák, M., Mikušová, P. and Matúš, P. (2014). Potential of Microscopic Fungi Isolated from Mercury Contaminated Soils to Accumulate and Volatilize Mercury(II). Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, 225(12). doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-014-2219-z.

    Wu, C., Tang, D., Dai, J., Tang, X., Bao, Y., Ning, J., Zhen, Q., Song, H., St. Leger, R.J. and Fang, W. (2022). Bioremediation of mercury-polluted Soil and Water by the Plant Symbiotic Fungus Metarhizium robertsii. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(47). doi:https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2214513119.

Protein involved in Mercury tolerance and reduction:

  • Methylmercury demethylase

  • Alkylmercury lyase

  • Mercury ion reductase

Functional groups involved in complexation and adsorption:

  • Sulfanyl group (thiol)

  • hydroxyl

  • amino

  • carboxyl

Types of Remediation:

  • Adsorption

  • Biovolatilization

  • Bioaccumulation

  • Precipitation

Methods of Remediation:

  • Immobilised biomass

  • Fungi & biochar hybrid

  • Fungi & biochar

  • Fungi & Phytoremediation

  • Fe203 magnetic nanoparticle