Uranium (U)

How Does Uranium Enter The Environment?

Unlike other heavy metals, uranium enters the environment as much from geogenic sources as it does from anthropogenic sources. At low concentrations, uranium is present in virtually all soil, rock, and water sources. The majority of this uranium, an estimated 99% comes in the form of U-238 and contributes to shallow radioactive detection in the environment. The alpha particles emitted by uranium during its gradual decay pose little threat to health through external exposure. However, the U-234 form, or decay products such as thorium-230 and radium-226, are far more radioactive and can have serve health consequences if ingested.

  1. Uranium Mining: The primary source of uranium release into the environment is through mining operations. During mining activities, uranium-containing ores are extracted from the ground, and in the process, uranium particles can become airborne or leach into surrounding soil and water.

  2. Ore Transport and Handling: The transportation and handling of uranium ore from mining sites to processing facilities can result in accidental spills or releases. These incidents can lead to the dispersal of uranium particles into the environment.

  3. Uranium Milling and Processing: Processing uranium ore involves milling, where the ore is crushed and ground into a fine powder. This process releases dust particles containing uranium, which can be carried by wind or settle into nearby soil and water bodies.

  4. Waste Rock and Tailings: Uranium mining and processing generate waste rock and tailings, which are the byproducts of ore extraction and milling. These waste materials contain residual uranium that is released into the environment through erosion or leaching.

  5. Acid Mine Drainage: Uranium ores are often associated with other minerals that contain sulfur. When these ores are exposed to air and water during mining or waste storage, sulfur compounds can oxidize, leading to the formation of acid mine drainage. Acidic water can mobilize uranium and other metals, releasing them into the environment.

  6. Spills and Leaks from Storage Facilities: Improper storage or containment of uranium ore, tailings, or radioactive waste can result in spills and leaks. This can occur at storage facilities, tanks, or containment ponds, leading to the direct release of uranium into the soil, water bodies, or the atmosphere.

  7. Nuclear Power Plants: Nuclear power plants utilize uranium as fuel for generating electricity. Although well-regulated, incidents such as accidents or leaks in these facilities can release uranium into the environment. This can occur through radioactive releases during normal plant operations or as a result of accidents, such as the Fukushima nuclear disaster in 2011.

  8. Uranium Enrichment Facilities: Uranium enrichment is a process that increases the concentration of uranium-235, a fissile isotope used in nuclear reactors. Enrichment facilities may release small amounts of uranium through emissions or waste products.

  9. Natural Weathering and Erosion: Uranium occurs naturally in the Earth's crust, and weathering and erosion processes can release uranium into the environment over time. This process contributes to the background levels of uranium found in soil, water, and air.

  10. Volcanic Activity: Volcanic eruptions can release uranium-rich volcanic ash and gases into the atmosphere. The ash can settle on soil and water surfaces, while the gases can disperse over large areas. However, the contribution of volcanic activity to overall uranium contamination is relatively minor compared to anthropogenic sources.

  11. Industrial Activities: Some industrial processes, such as metal smelting or coal combustion, can release trace amounts of uranium as a byproduct. These emissions can contaminate nearby soil and water bodies if not adequately controlled.

  12. Atmospheric Deposition: Uranium particles can be transported over long distances through the atmosphere and deposited onto soil and water surfaces. This deposition can occur through dry deposition (settling of particles) or wet deposition (rain or snow-carrying particles to the ground). Atmospheric deposition can contribute to uranium contamination in areas far from the original emission sources.

  13. Fertilizers and Phosphate Mining: Phosphate fertilizers and phosphate mining can contain trace amounts of uranium. When these fertilizers are applied to agricultural lands or when phosphate mining residues are not properly managed, uranium can enter the soil, potentially affecting crops and nearby ecosystems.

  14. Contaminated Water Sources: Uranium can enter water bodies through runoff from mining sites, leaching from waste storage facilities, or natural weathering of uranium-rich rocks. Dirty water can then spread the uranium to surrounding soil and aquatic ecosystems.

  15. Nuclear Weapons Testing: Historic nuclear weapons testing, particularly atmospheric tests conducted before the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty, released significant amounts of uranium and other radioactive materials into the environment. These tests generated radioactive fallout, which deposited uranium particles over wide areas, contributing to global uranium contamination.

How Does Uranium Effect Soil?

  1. Toxicity: Uranium is a heavy metal, and high concentrations of uranium in soil can be toxic to microorganisms. Uranium toxicity can disrupt microbial metabolic processes and interfere with essential cellular functions. It can impair enzyme activity, inhibit electron transport chains, and interfere with energy production and nutrient uptake in microorganisms. These toxic effects can lead to a decrease in microbial biomass and a decline in overall microbial activity.

  2. Redox Reactions: Uranium can undergo redox reactions in soil, cycling between different oxidation states (uranium IV and uranium VI). Microorganisms play a critical role in mediating these redox reactions. Certain bacteria, known as metal-reducing bacteria, have the ability to reduce uranium from its more soluble and mobile form (uranium VI) to its less soluble and immobile form (uranium IV). This reduction process can immobilize uranium in the soil, reducing its bioavailability and potential toxicity.

  3. Disruption of Microbial Communities: Uranium contamination can alter the composition and structure of microbial communities in soil. High levels of uranium can selectively inhibit the growth of certain microbial species, leading to shifts in community composition. Some microbial taxa may be more tolerant to uranium and can potentially thrive in contaminated environments, while others may be more sensitive and experience a decline in abundance. These changes in microbial community structure can have cascading effects on soil processes and nutrient cycling.

  4. Radiation Effects: Uranium is a radioactive element, and its decay products can emit ionizing radiation. Microorganisms in soil that are exposed to ionizing radiation from uranium and its progeny can experience DNA damage and mutations. Chronic exposure to radiation can reduce microbial reproductive capabilities, decrease microbial diversity, and increase mortality rates. These radiation effects can alter microbial community dynamics and impact the overall microbial activity in soil.

  5. Nutrient Limitations: Uranium contamination can cause nutrient imbalances in soil, which can affect microbial activity. High levels of uranium may interfere with the availability and uptake of essential nutrients for microorganisms, such as nitrogen, phosphorus, and sulfur. Nutrient limitations can reduce microbial growth rates and metabolic activity, ultimately impacting soil processes mediated by microorganisms, including organic matter decomposition and nutrient cycling.

It is important to note that the specific effects of uranium on microbial activity can vary depending on factors such as the concentration and speciation of uranium, soil characteristics, and the composition of microbial communities. The understanding of these interactions is important for assessing the ecological consequences of uranium contamination and for developing strategies to mitigate its impact on soil microbial communities.

Uranium Decay States

Modified Mycelium Biomass

Functional groups:

  • hydroxyl

  • carbonyl

  • nitrogen groups

  • amino groups

  • amine groups

  • alcohol

  • sulfonic acid group

  • acetal

  • carboxyl

  • phosphoryl

  • adenosine-monophosphate

  • fructose(6)-phosphate

  • lipopolysaccharides

  • phosphorylated amino acids (threonine, tyrosine, and tryptophan)

Unconventional uranium, in its radiotoxic form, can be found in phosphate rock which is heavily mined during fertilizer production. The biomineralization of uranium phosphate by fungal biomass, is thought to be actioned by fungal acid phosphatases, a ubiquitous secretion by mycorrhizal fungi that releases bound phosphorus from organic sources, which increases the availability of phosphate ligands required for bonding. Additionally, Studies have demonstrated that uranium (238 and 233) tolerance in yeast species is largely enabled by phosphate transporter (PT) genes. Deletion of PT genes results in uranium sensitivity, implicating PT genes (PHO86, PHO84, PHO2, and PHO87) in uranium tolerance. 

Fungi Capacity pH Time Biomass Removal Type Method Reference
Talaromyces emersonii
CBS 814.70
323.
mg/g
5 2m Immobilised (M) biosorption Batch mode L. Bengtsson et al 1995
Mucor hiemalis 89% 5 48(hr) Living (M) accumulation Mixed insoluble cell walls E. Hoque&F. Fritscher 2019
Aspergillus fumigatus 87.8% 5 2h Immobilised (M) biosorption CaCl2 beads J. Wang et al 2010
A. niger 75.5% 5.8 3d 12h Immobilised (M) bioprecipitation Glass beads G. Li et al 2022
P. javanicus - 6.9 6w 6d Living (M) bioprecipitation amended G2PModified
Czapek–Dox medium
X. Lang et al 2015
Xylaria sp 288.42 
mg/g
5 30m Immobilised (m) adsorption graphene oxide aerogel Li et al 2018
Penicillium piscarium 97.5% 3.5 1h Immobilised (M) bioprecipitation Batch mode E. Coelho et al 2020
Trichoderma harzianum 97.3% 4.5 8h Immobilised (m) adsorption Ca-alginate K. Akhtar et al 2009
Fusarium sp. ZZF51 61.89% 4 1h Immobilised (m) adsorption Batch mode H. Yang et al 2011
Fusarium sp. ZZF51 96.02% 7 1h Living (M) biosorption cetyltrimethyl ammonium
bromide (CTAB) modified
D. Hou et al 2015
Lentinus concinnus 100% 5 2h Immobilised (m) adsorption
(p) ion-exchange
DABSA ligand O. Celikbicak et al 2021
Cladosporium sp 99.6% 8 12h Immobilised (m) adsorption nanorods and nanoplates J. Lee et al 2021
Penicillium sp 280.8.
mg/g
3 48(hr) Immobilised (m) adsorption bio-nanocomposites of
fungus-Fe3O4
C. Ding et al 2015
Geotrichum sp. dwc-1 94% 7 16h Living (M) accumulation
(p) biosorption
Batch mode C. Zhao et al 2016
Fusarium sp. ZZF51 446.20
mg g−1
6.5 2h 10m Immobilised (m) adsorption Fungal-modified
monoamidoxime material
N. Tan et al 2023
Fusarium sp. ZZF51 584.60
mg g−1
5.5 2h Immobilised (m) adsorption tri-amidoxime
modified material
J. Han et al 2020
Ganoderma lucidum 80% 4.5 2h Immobilised (m) adsorption Batch mode M. Vyas & M. Kulshrestha
  • Phospholipid-binding proteins

  • Phosphate Transporter genes

  • mannoproteins

  • hydrolase

  • phytase

  • acid phosphatases (ATPs)

  • phosphoprotein phosphatase

  • metallo-dependant phosphatase

  • protein tyrosine phosphatase

  • exopolyphosphatase

  • Histidine phosphatase

  • Akhtar, K., Khalid, A.M., Akhtar, M.W. and Ghauri, M.A. (2009). Removal and Recovery of Uranium from Aqueous Solutions by Ca-alginate Immobilized Trichoderma Harzianum. Bioresource Technology, 100(20), pp.4551–4558. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2009.03.073.

    Coelho, E., Reis, T.A., Cotrim, M., Rizzutto, M. and Corrêa, B. (2020). Bioremediation of Water Contaminated with Uranium Using Penicillium piscarium. Biotechnology Progress, [online] 36(5). doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/btpr.3032.

    Ding, C., Cheng, W., Sun, Y. and Wang, X. (2015). Novel fungus-Fe3O4 bio-nanocomposites as High Performance Adsorbents for the Removal of Radionuclides. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 295, pp.127–137. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.04.032.

    Gerber, U., Hübner, R., Rossberg, A., Krawczyk-Bärsch, E. and Merroun, M.L. (2018). Metabolism-dependent bioaccumulation of uranium by Rhodosporidium toruloides isolated from the flooding water of a former uranium mine. PLOS ONE, 13(8), p.e0201903. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201903.

    Han, J.-W., Hu, L., He, L., Kang Seung Ji, Liu, Y., Chen, C., Luo, X. and Tan, N. (2020). Preparation and uranium (VI) biosorption for tri-amidoxime modified marine fungus material. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(30), pp.37313–37323. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-07746-z.

    Hou, D., Chen, F., Yang, S.K., Yan, X.M., Long, W., Zhang, W., Jia, X.H. and Tan, N. (2015). Study on uranium(VI) biosorption of marine-derived fungus treated by cetyltrimethyl ammonium bromide. Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry, 307(2), pp.1147–1154. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-015-4303-2.

    Jisu Lee, Sue Jung Lee, Sungho Kim, Jong-Un Lee, Kwang-Soon Shin, Hor-Gil Hur, Layers of Uranium Phosphate Nanorods and Nanoplates Encrusted on Fungus Cladosporium sp. Strain F1 Hyphae, Microbes and Environments, 2021, Volume 36, Issue 4, Released on J-STAGE November 13, 2021, Online ISSN 1347-4405, Print ISSN 1342-6311, https://doi.org/10.1264/jsme2.ME21036, https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jsme2/36/4/36_ME21036/_article/-char/en

    Kolhe, N., Zinjarde, S. and Acharya, C. (2018). Responses Exhibited by Various Microbial Groups Relevant to Uranium Exposure. Biotechnology Advances, 36(7), pp.1828–1846. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2018.07.002.

    Li, G., Sun, J., Li, F., Wang, Y. and Li, Q. (2022). Macroparticle-enhanced bioleaching of uranium using Aspergillus niger. Minerals Engineering, 180, p.107493. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2022.107493.

    Li, Y., Li, L., Chen, T., Duan, T., Yao, W., Zheng, K., Dai, L. and Zhu, W. (2018). Bioassembly of fungal hypha/graphene oxide aerogel as high performance adsorbents for U(VI) removal. Chemical Engineering Journal, 347, pp.407–414. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2018.04.140.

    Liang, X., Hillier, S., Pendlowski, H., Gray, N., Ceci, A. and Gadd, G.M. (2015). Uranium phosphate biomineralization by fungi. Environmental Microbiology, [online] 17, pp.2064–2075. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.12771.

    Ömür Çelikbıçak, Gulay Bayramoglu, Ilkay Acıkgoz-Erkaya and Mehmet Yakup Arica (2021). Aggrandizement of Uranium (VI) Removal Performance of Lentinus Concinnus Biomass by Attachment of 2,5-diaminobenzenesulfonic Acid Ligand. Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry Volume, 328(3), pp.1085–1098. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-021-07708-w.

    Schaefer, S., Steudtner, R., René Hübner, Krawczyk-Bärsch, E. and Merroun, M.L. (2021). Effect of Temperature and Cell Viability on Uranium Biomineralization by the Uranium Mine Isolate Penicillium Simplicissimum. Front Microbiol., [online] 12. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.802926.

    Tan, N., Ye, Q., Liu, Y., Yang, Y., Ding, Z., Liu, L., Wang, D. and Zeng, C. (2022). A fungal-modified Material with High Uranium (VI) Adsorption Capacity and Strong anti-interference Ability. Environmental Science and Pollution Research Volume, 30(10), pp.26752–26763. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-24092-4.

    TY - JOUR AU - Dr. Dr. Hoque, Enam AU - Fritscher, Johannes PY - 2019/07/16 SP - T1 - Multimetal bioremediation and biomining by a combination of new aquatic strains of Mucor hiemalis OPEN VL - 9 DO - 10.1038/s41598-019-46560-7 JO - Scientific Reports ER -

    Wang, J., Hu, X., Liu, Y., Xie, S. and Bao, Z. (2010). Biosorption of uranium (VI) by immobilized Aspergillus fumigatus beads. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 101(6), pp.504–508. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2010.03.002.

  • pH

  • temperature

  • biomass concentration

  • Cell viability

  • Lipids

  • pigments

  • polysaccharides

  • cytoplasm

  • siderophores

Biosorption occurs when fungal cell walls, composed of chitin, glucans, and other polysaccharides, provide binding sites for uranium ions. The positively charged uranium ions (U^6+) are attracted to negatively charged functional groups such as carboxyl, hydroxyl, and amino groups, that are present on the fungal cell wall. This electrostatic interaction allows the fungi to adsorb uranium onto their cell surfaces, effectively removing it from the surrounding environment. This union of complimentary ions can be otherwise thought of as a biological magnet. As any year ten experiment involving the removal of fractured metals from aqueous solutions using magnets will tell you, once the union of positive and negative charges has taken place, the magnet can be lifted from the solution resulting in the successful recovery of the metals adhering to its surface.

  • Glutaraldehyde-modified viable biomass

  • Bioprecipitation

  • Adsorption

  • Complexation

  • Chelation

  • Enzymatic degradation

  • nanoparticle

Fungi employ complexation and chelation mechanisms to sequester uranium. Certain fungi produce extracellular metabolites, such as organic acids, siderophores, and exopolysaccharides, which express a high affinity for uranium ions. These metabolites can bind to uranium and form stable complexes or chelates. For example, organic acids, including citric acid and oxalic acid, can form complexes with uranium, reducing its solubility and mobility in the environment. Siderophores, which are small iron-chelating compounds produced by fungi, can also bind to uranium due to their structural similarities with iron-chelating sites. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, a single-celled fungus commonly used in the fermentation of alcohols, the formation of HUO2PO4·4H2O (H-autunite) was observed during the bioprecipitation of uranium. This formation is the result of the complexation of adsorbed uranium with phosphates released from the fungal cell wall. 

  1. Ionizing Radiation: Uranium is a radioactive element, and its decay products can emit ionizing radiation, such as alpha particles, beta particles, and gamma rays. When uranium or its progeny decay near DNA molecules, the ionizing radiation can directly interact with the DNA. Ionizing radiation has sufficient energy to remove electrons from atoms and molecules, leading to the formation of free radicals and reactive oxygen species (ROS). These reactive species can damage DNA by causing breaks in the DNA strands or altering the DNA bases.

  2. Double-Strand Breaks: Ionizing radiation from uranyl ions can cause double-strand breaks (DSBs) in DNA. DSBs are severe DNA lesions where both strands of the DNA double helix are broken. DSBs can result in the loss of genetic information or cause rearrangements when the broken DNA ends are repaired. Improper repair of DSBs can lead to mutations or chromosomal abnormalities that can have long-lasting effects on the stability and functioning of the genome. The prevention of DSB repair has been critically associated with the depressed activities of repair proteins in homologous recombination (HR) pathways, including ATM, BRCA1, RPA80, and ExO1.

  3. DNA Base Damage: Uranium can induce chemical changes in DNA bases. It can directly interact with DNA bases, leading to modifications such as oxidized bases or the formation of DNA adducts. These modifications can disrupt the normal base pairing in DNA, affecting DNA replication, transcription, and repair processes. The accumulation of DNA base damage can increase the risk of mutations and genetic instability.

  4. Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) Production: Uranium exposure can result in productions of reactive oxygen species (ROS) through both direct and indirect mechanisms. ROS, such as superoxide radicals and hydrogen peroxide, can cause oxidative stress in cells. ROS can react with DNA, causing oxidative damage to DNA bases, sugar-phosphate backbone, and DNA repair enzymes. This oxidative damage can lead to DNA lesions and increase the risk of mutations.

  5. Indirect Effects: Uranium can indirectly impact DNA by affecting cellular processes and disrupting the balance of essential molecules involved in DNA replication, transcription, and repair. Uranium exposure can interfere with enzymatic activities involved in DNA replication or repair, impairing the fidelity and efficiency of these processes. This can result in errors in DNA replication and accumulation of DNA damage. For example, uranyl acetate exposure results in the loss of zinc from the zinc fingerprint DNA repair proteins PARP-1, APTx, Pigmentosum, and ADP-ribose. The loss of zinc from these proteins causes disruptions and inhibitions of essential DNA repair operations.

  6. Genomic Instability: Uranium-induced DNA damage and alterations can lead to genomic instability, which refers to an increased propensity for genetic changes within cells and their progeny. Genomic instability can manifest as chromosomal rearrangements, gene mutations, and alterations in DNA copy number. These changes can disrupt normal cellular functions and contribute to the development of diseases, including cancer.